verostko main menu  |  contact | copyright | home       

THE ALGORISTS by Roman Verostko

Jean-Pierre Hébert

Chicago, 1992,
sienna natural and cobalt blue;
pen and inks on technical paper.

© j.p.hebert

Often I am asked "Who are the algorists?"  Simply put an algorist is anyone who works with algorithms.  Historically we have viewed algorists as mathematicians.  But it also applies to artists who create art using algorithmic procedures that include their own algorithms.  This page presents an account of the adaptation of this term by a group of artists in 1995.  Algorithmic art has a deep history that reaches back to prehistoric art. But the advent of computing power spawned an artistic practice with form-generating features that is relatively unique to the last quarter of the 20th Century. Computer power gives the artist's algorithms a leverage we might liken to the power of the engine in the industrial revolution.  In 1969, when I first tasted algorithmic leverage, I set out to learn how to use it as an artist.


Roman Verostko (left) and Jean Pierre Hebert (right), 2011, Santa Barbara. In 1995, Jean-Pierre suggested that we adapt the
 term  algorist  for our identity. He also wrote the algorithm defining "algorist" that is now viewed as an "algorist manifesto" .

Revisit my 2003
In Memoriam
ean-Pierre Hebert

Master Algorist
1939 - 2021

Jean-Pierre Master Algorist

I met other artists following the same path who were interested in an identity for their algorithmic art practice. It was Jean Pierre Hebert (JPH) who suggested we adopt the term "algorist" and he also wrote the algorithm for an algorist.  This algorithm is now viewed as the "algorist manifesto" and it was JPH who led discussions and correspondence in establishing its usage.  While the practice of algorithmic art reaches back to pre-historic basket-weaving and tool-making the implementation with computing power provided new "form-generating" capabilities.

Although adapted in 1995 the term applies to work by colleagues that date back to the 1960's and even earlier.  With the rise of ubiquitous computing algorithmic art now ranges  from games and interfaces with biological life to experiments with the evolution of form and social consciousness.

The term "algorithm"

The term algorithm is an alternative spelling for the term "algorism". Thus a person who works with  algorisms (or algorithms) is an algorist.  Traditionally the term algorist is associated with mathematicians. An algorithm refers primarily to the step by step mathematical procedure for carrying out a specific calculating task (see note 1). With the advent of computers we find ourselves writing procedures that reach beyond solving mathematical problems. The detailed instruction directing a drawing machine on how to draw a visual form is also an algorithm.  Today, more broadly, a composer's score for musical form and a choreographer's notations for dance may also be viewed as algorithms. Such notations, similar to computer software formats, are detailed procedures for carrying out a task. From this perspective we could also view the recipe for baking a cake as an algorithm.

This Seventeenth Century keyboard music, is thought to be in the hand of the great keyboard composer, Girolamo Frescobaldi (1583-1643). The Vatican folios shown (23 & 24)  display the opening from his Fourth Toccata. The score may be viewed as an algorithm, expressive both in structure and in the writing hand of the composer.  © Vatican Library MS: Chig. Q. IV 29 fols. 23 verso-24 recto music17 NB.40.  Image source:

Algorithmic art may be found throughout history, from prehistoric basket weaving to geometric and conceptual art in the 20th Century. However,  the advent of computers provide us with form-generating leverage that, to the best of my knowledge, has no precedent in  the history of art. It is in  this sense that algorist artists of the late 20th Century pioneered procedures that have come to permeate the visual and sound arts in  the 21st Century.

Left to Right: Mark Wilson, Manfred Mohr, Roman Verostko & Frieder Nake: Four algorist pioneers at the Victoria & Albert, Museum, Jan 5, 2010. Photo by Douglas Dodds in the context of a V & A display of their work. 

 Hiroshi Kawano 1925-2012   photo at ZKM in 2010, ©zkm

In the latter half of the 20th Century, with the growth in information science and digital technologies the use of  algorithmic procedure spread far beyond the dreams of its earliest practitioners. We  have, among the living in 2012, a number of  algorists whose vision and work with programming  pointed the way that permeates the world of  art today. Pictured above, in a single frame,  are four algorists who were present in the context of a display of  digital pioneer works at the Victoria & Albert in London, 2010. A retrospective of  the pioneer work of Hiroshi  Kawano, pictured above, was presented at the ZKM in Karlsruhe, Germany, in 2011-12 before he died.   While not present for the photo above, celebrated pioneers like Herbert Franke, Vera Molnar, Charles Csuri, and Harold Cohen (shown below), were also represented in the Digital Pioneers V&A display (Note 8.) .   Other important contributors to the pioneers showing, not pictured here, included  George Nees and Edward Zajec. 

Herbert Franke photo by Andreas Hübner Vera Molnar, 1985, archives of Frieder Nake's comp-art data base. Charles Csuri on occasion of his SIGGRAPH Lifetime Achievement  Award, 2011,.Vancouver, Canada. Harold Cohe (1 May 1928-27 April 2016 From the film: Age of  the Intelligent Machines

Historic Notes: Writing the score for drawing.

In the last quarter of the 20th Century I was one of a like minded group of artists who undertook to write instructions for executing our art.  In the 1970's & 80's  "Computer art" was the term generally applied to all art associated with computers.  Some of us had been working with algorithmic procedure for about a quarter century before our 1995 declaration as "algorists".  The 1995 manifesto of the "algorists" was not a declaration of something new; rather, it was giving identity to an artistic practice that had already brought radical change and would continue to change the way we would create art in  the 21st Century. The algorist adaptation provided a name for artists who practiced algorithmic art.  This practice also had a valuable presence in sculpture and music. Helaman Ferguson would be a sculptor whose algorithmic art  celebrated an aesthetic rooted in mathematics.  His "Four Canoes", shown below, is an excellent example with links to information on the procedure for achieving the form of the tori, the pedestal, and the platform.

Helaman Ferguson

"Four Canoes", 1997, University of St Thomas Science and Engineering Center, St. Paul, MN, USA. This impressive algorithmic presence features two interlocked six foot granite tori mounted on a platform created with hexagonal tiling. 

 Note 6

See also:  UmbilicTorus at Stonybrook

Yet algorithmic art should not be confused with the practice of mathematics. The process of writing the score for a drawing requires poetic engagement similar to that required for composing the score for music.  Algorithmic drawings, like my "Green Cloud" shown below, evolved from my passion, as a painter, for the marriage of spontaneous brushwork and studied arrangement.  With elementary programming abilities I explored the same goals I had set for myself as a painter.  Clearly programming and mathematics do not create art.  Programming is a tool that serves the vision and passion of the artist who creates the procedure.

*Green Cloud (the drawing)" by Roman Verostko.  Pen & ink plotter drawing. Drawing process presented as a Three Story Drawing Machine, June 2011 at the Minneapolis College of Art & Design (MCAD). Three Story Drawing Machine, north wall, MCAD,  Northern Spark, "White Night", ca. 4:30 AM, June 5, 2011, nearing the end of an 8 hour, all night drawing session.


Before looking back  let me note that several pioneer algorists have carried their form explorations well into the 21st Century. Of these Manfred Mohr and Harold Cohen stand out as two of those master pioneers who were the first to achieve mature algorithmic styles.  Manfred's  "Klangfarben" series  demonstrates the power of algorithmic procedure in the hands of a master. Manfred has labored for over 40 years creating visual tension fields as an art of pure visual form. In this series we experience algorithmic form generation in real time.
  Manfred Mohr, "Klangfarben" series (2006-2007)
Bitforms Gallery on Vimeo.  © Manfred Mohr
Harold Cohen, Starting Over,  2011, oil painting, 50 by 80 inches

 "Aaron", a personification of Harold Cohen's software, represents over 30 years of work on creating an intelligent artist.  Aaron's drawings and paintings,  grew from Harold's earlier experience as a painter. Consequently "Aaron's" code  appears to yield a mysterious relationship to Harold as the artist-painter in his earlier years. 

Historically how did we get here?

In the earlier days of computing there were no software tools for artists. Frieder Nake told me how he came upon the task of writing software for a drawing machine at the University of Stuttgart in 1963.  The company did not supply software with the machine and he was assigned the task.  During the  1960's  several artists like Manfred Mohr and Hiroshi Kawano saw the "form-generating" power of computers as an opportunity for art. Hiroshi Kawano had hoped to gain insight into the logic underlying our creative process.  Software and technical procedures for visualization grew hand in hand with hardware. Artists engaging new computing and visualizing technologies had to either collaborate with engineers for programming their ideas or else create their own programs (algorithms). 

Manfred Mohr, New York

P-021/A, "band-structure", ink/paper, 1969, 50cm x 50cm
Early plotter drawing in a series achieved with algorithmic procedures that included rules he viewed as  



P702F, Endurachrome, 2000. canvas, 76cm x 100cm.
This work belongs to the artist's space/color work phase that followed about 30 years of his work in monochrome. Mohr's work with coded procedure, steadfast for over a period of 43 years, demonstrates the power of algorithmic procedure. Yet the term algorist was not introduced until 26 years after his first algorithmic work.

© 2000 by Manfred Mohr

Those artists who first experimented with  coded artistic  procedures with computers included Hiroshi Kawano, Herbert Frank, Manfred MohrFrieder Nake, Georg Nees, Vera Molnar, and Edward Zajec.  Artists who used computers in the art-making process were often called "computer artists".  Frieder Nake, a pioneer algorist, has, in recent years, served as the chief investigator documenting first generation "Digital Art"  at the University of Bremen in Germany.  This "CompArt" data bank provides an excellent source for perusing the breadth and depth of early algorithmic art.  From the 1970's up to the early 1990's this work was generally referred to as "computer art", a term that became the umbrella for any kind of art associated with computers. 


Artificial Mondrian, 1967. Rendered in Gouache on paper. The model for this work was coded in Fortran with a HITACHI 5020 in Tokyo.  ZKM Collection, Karlsruhe.

Hiroshi Kawano (1925-2012) began exploring visual form with computers in order  "to understand the logic of the creative process in human art" 

In Memory of Hiroshi Kawano by Margit Rosen


A.Michael Noll, USA, Computer composition with lines, 1964.   This drawing was meant to mime procedures similar to those employed by Mondrian for his  "Composition with lines".     

For sources see   Note 7

Hardware: IBM 7094 computer  and  a General Dynamics SC-4020 microfilm plotter.


Frieder Nake, Germany

Nr. 2 Homage à Paul Klee,
Dated: September 13, 1965
Program: COMPART ER 56.
Drawn with Zuse-Graphomat Z 64
Size: 50 × 50 cm
Signed lower left: Nake/ER56/Z64

Produced at the Technische Hochschule Stuttgart

Artwork Type: serigraphic print edition after plotter drawing.
Ink on paper. Collections include:
Museum of Contemporary Art, Zagreb, V&A Collection, London.

Herbert Franke, Electronic Graphics,1961-62.. Vera Molnar, Quadrilaterals, pen & ink, 1988
 30 by 35 cm., Coll. Szollosi-Nagy-Nemes
  Harold Cohen, 1999
Aaron's Garden, pen and ink drawing plotted by Aaron in 1989. "Aaron" is a "personal expert system" that Harold Cohen  developed for generating art. "Aaron"  consists of Harold's coded program of generative drawing procedures and a flat bed pen plotter.  Aaron's drawings of two figures in a garden  recall  the  tradition of representing Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.

© h.cohen


 Above:  Edward Zajec
             plotter drawing, 1969

left: Georg Nees,  «Schotter».  " a computer graphic from the 1960s,
produced by a structured operation by random generators that lead
to the discovery of new images. This graphic visually displays the
relationship between order and disorder, and the effects of change."
Georg Nees


Venues for exhibiting "computer art" emerged in the 1980's when various symposia and conferences, both national and international, began including exhibitions and papers related to the use of computing procedures in the arts.  Leonardo, the quarterly on art science and technology,  played an important role for emerging algorithmic art  by including essays and  documentation of exhibitions for ISEA, the Digital Salon, and SIGGRAPH .  Ars Electronica, with its annual symposium, catalogues  and awards provided us with papers and examples with a growing community of practitioners.  (See note 2)

By the mid to later 1980's a fair number of artists using original algorithms had  achieved distinctive algorithmic styles, each with a body of mature work. Working independently of each other, we found, when we did meet,  that we shared many similar experiences.  Furthermore we could be helpful to each other by establishing our unique identity.  While I had little contact with  Manfred Mohr, Frieder Nake, and Vera Molnar I was aware of their work and shared some of the same exhibiting venues.


Detail: Flowers of Learning, Madame Curie.  Algorithmic pen ink drawing, one of seven in a 25 foot permanent installation, Spalding University, Academic Learning Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Roman Verostko, 2006.  PDF Catalogue: Flowers...

Jean Pierre Hebert, 1999
Santa Barbara, CA

Artist's coded procedure  from 100 views of a megagon.

print 8" by 8" image on paper, Somerset Book, measuring 12.75" by 19".

© j.p.hebert

Peter Beyls, 1988
Ghent, Belgium

Untitled algorithmic pen plotter drawing tinted with watercolor. 

11.5" by 16.5" 
Artist's software
Hardware: Symbolics 3600 & HP plotter

© p.beyls

Stephen Bell, 1977-79. Detail of one of a drawing created with his ranstack algorithm.

The ranstak programs were the first programs developed by Bell as a postgraduate student at the Slade School of Art in 1977-79 in the Department of Experimental & Electronic Art.

I met Peter Beyls, Stephen Bell and Brian Evans  at the first ISEA  in Utrecht in 1988 where we presented papers on our algorithmic practice.  As I recall,  we were all interested in identifying what was unique in the work of artists who pursued algorithmic art.  At the  Minneapolis ISEA in 1993 Peter Beyls and I discussed forming a panel on algorithmic art for the 1994 Helsinki ISEA.  Peter chaired the Helsinki panel and planned a similar panel on "Artists and Algorithms"  for the 1995 SIGGRAPH conference in Los Angeles, USA.     We invited Jean Pierre to join  us in the 1995 panel.  This panel, chaired by Peter Beyls (Belgium), included  Jean Pierre Hebert (US), Brian Evans (US), Stephen Bell (UK), Ken Musgrave (US) and myself.  My paper identified specific features and procedures that lay at the core of algorithmic art (see:

In an informal casual meeting sometime shortly  after the panel, Jean Pierre, Ken Musgrave and I  briefly discussed forming an informal group of artists who shared similar interests in algorithmic art. We were especially interested in establishing a name for those of us who practiced algorithmic art.  I have always felt that the title of our panel, the milieu of that conference, the vitality of the panel members and our shared common interests, was the springboard for establishing our identity as "algorists". 

Above: Jean-Pierre Hébert   with two of his  "Bright Wavelet" digital drawings,  2008 (38" by 77"). Hebert played a key role in establishing usage of the term algorists (note 9),
  www.jeanpierrehebert.comphoto by roman, 2011 

Following the conference Jean Pierre Hebert, Ken Musgrave and I  began correspondence in search of a term and possible ways to share views.  During that period we invited others to join in this exchange. We added a number of artists to a list and also had invited several others to join in the correspondence. ( Note 11 )  It was Jean Pierre who proposed using the term "algorist".  Noting that algorists "ought to be defined with an algorithm", he also wrote an algorithm identifying an algorist as one who uses one's own algorithms for creating art objects.   The correspondence I have located is dated August 31, 1995 (Note 10)  Jean Pierre's name for the group and his algorithm were both brilliant contributions serving as an identity and a manifesto. The Hebert algorithm, as quoted below, is formatted  precisely as received :

if (creation && object of art && algorithm && one's own algorithm) {
include * an algorist *
} elseif (!creation || !object of art || !algorithm || !one's own algorithm) {
exclude * not an algorist *

So artists who create an object of art with a process that includes their own algorithms are identified as algorists.

Jean-Pierre Hébert

sand trace


© jp hebert

In the late 1990's Jean Pierre and I continued to exchanged ideas and I usually visited with him when  SIGGRAPH met in LA.  After the turn of the Century I  wrote a review of his work that had never been published. This review followed  one occasion when my wife  and I enjoyed experiencing, along with Claire and Jean Pierre,  a late evening watching his Sisyphus slowly tracing pathways in the sand. Recently I located the article along with our earlier 1995 correspondence. I am posting my review here for colleagues who may not be aware of how much we shared in the 1990's. See: Jean-Pierre Master Algorist.   

Above: Brian Evans, A visualization (a mapping) of
 Beethoven’s Ode to Joy, date unknown. see note 5

see:   © Brian Evans

Ken Musgrave, USA, Inkjet on rag paper . 
4" of 5 ', ca. 1995
Slickrock III, 11.5" by 20.5"

© k.musgrave
Hans Dehlinger,  Kassel,

D162 "Turm", 1993
Paper: 11.75" by 16.5"

Pen & ink. algorithmic pen plotted drawing.

Private Collection

© h.dehlinger

As artists employing algorithmic procedures the term algorist fit our interests well.  In general we are fairly agreed that algorists are artists who include original algorithmic procedures in the course of creating their work. The use of algorithms in and of itself does not constitute algorist work. It is the inclusion of one's own algorithms that makes the difference. 

As algorists with or without computers, we all employ algorithms created by colleagues and predecessors. The algorithms for geometry and perspective come to mind. We depend on algorithms others have created for everything from the circuit logic and operating system of our computers to the computer languages and the editors that we use.

The algorist goes one step further by introducing original algorithms for generating "art".  The jewel of algorist art lies in the artist's own "form-generating algorithms", the artist's unique procedures for creating the form.  From this perspective Mozart's score for a Sonata, the architect's plan for the building, and Hans Dehlinger's code for a drawing are all "form-generating" algorithms. 

Algorithms have been used variously in the arts for centuries. And the procedures were carried out manually without the use of machines.  Clearly an algorist may also practice her art without the use of computers. That has been the case in the work of Channa Horwitz (1932-2013)  whose algorist work was executed entirely by hand. Her algorithms are profoundly informed by progressions and number.  Channa is one of the four algorists in the first show that  Jean Pierre Hebert curated at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics in Santa Barbara, a show noted at the end of this essay.

Chanah Horwitz, "Canon # 10", 1983, Plaka on Mylar, 23-1/2 x 26-1/2 inch.  © C Horwitz

Finally, one aspect of the algorist definition remains open to interpretation. An algorist, by definition, creates "art".   The definition does not identify what constitutes "art". One might employ original algorithms and create work that one person may experience as art while another may not experience it as art. For example a mathematician may use original algorithms in creating a scientific visualization that some may view as "art". Yet the visualization may not fit another's conception of "art". While we may have our various preferences the definition cannot and, in my view,  should not attempt to define what kind of work belongs in the world of the art we choose to cultivate.



Paul Brown, 1997, UK, Australia
 Gymnasts, Print, 60 X 80 cm


This essay can only suggest the breadth of this practice. For example let me point to the important work of  Paul Brown,  an algorist whose writings and newsletters kept us well informed for years, even before we had the web. Dividing his living between London and Australia he identifies with those circles in the UK involved with the theory and practice of generative art.  This includes  Ernest Edmonds whom I first met in 1996 at his annual conference on "Creativity and Cognition" at Loughborough. As an algorist, deeply involved with the nature and practice of generative art, his writing, teaching and art work has been felt widely by colleagues and students. 

Ernest Edmonds, Four Shaping Forms, 2009, Acrylic and digital print on canvas,
50x50 cm each.    © E Edmonds
Yoshiyuki Abe, Japan

2000, prints

Image 75

Image 97


© Yoshiyuki Abe, Japan

Algorists who had been active since the 1970's had no common identity and therefore no web site or historical reference to their work specifically.   In 1996  J.P. Hebert introduced several pages dedicated to the algorists.  These pages spelled out essential features of "algorist" art, historical precedents, and links to related topics and issues. These initial pages identified an informal group of active algorists including  Yoshiyuke Abbe, Harold Cohen, Charles Csuri, Hans DehlingerHelaman Ferguson, Manfred Mohr, Vera Molnar, Mark Wilson,  and others.  

Mark Wilson USA"12D90", 1990 plotter drawing 

36 x 48 inches (91 x 121 cm.), pen & ink on paper.
Private collection.

©  m.wilson
Vlatko Čerić,  2005, Zagreb, Croatia
Evolution #5 of 10, digital print, 6.7" by 6.7"
Hahnemuhle paper measuring 11.7" by 16.5" .

Vlatko Čerić is one of many algorists, who employ generative procedures and demonstrate the breadth and depth of algorist artistic achievement.   

©Vlatco Ceric

Paul Hertz, 2011. Chicago, USA.

Good Bait, Algorithmic digital print, 8.5" by 11"

Many first generation algorists worked with pen plotters as their first graphic interface.  Some shared a common history that grew out of conceptual art and an interest in the emerging information processing technologies of the 1960's. Put in perspective the work of  first generation algorists marked a turning point in the history of western culture. Algorithmic procedures have changed everything from the way we create film and music to the way we run wall street, the military and our communications systems.

"Paul", a robotic arm drawing my portrait  on Sept 28, 2011, at the University of London, Goldsmiths. This robotic arm, "Paul", is the work of Patrick Tresset in "The Aikon Project". His research  uses computational and robotic technologies to explore drawing activity with a focus on face sketching.


The numerous sites and groups involved with algorist art at the turn of the century testify to a  remarkable growth of coded procedures in virtually all the arts.  Other terms may be used but they all share one thing in common - algorithmic procedure. This holds for generative art, genetic art, bio arts and cyber arts  as well as a wide range of interactive and robotic work. As this 21st Century unfolds algorithmic art emerges as a major force in the arts. (See Note 1.a for a list with links) 


left to right: Hans Dehlinger,  Jean Pierre Hebert,  Channa Horwitz,  Roman Verostko

Above:   work shown in " The  Algorists: four visual artists in the land of Newton", curated by Hebert at  the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA. March 13-June 30, 2006. Click here for catalogue

While algorists themselves presented their own shows and participated in group shows it was Jean Pierre Hebert  who curated the first exhibition formally identified as "algorist". This exhibition was presented at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics in 2006 (University of California at Santa Barbara).  The catalogue for this show provides an excellent introduction to the nature of algorithmic practice with specific examples of algorithmic drawings by four artists:  The Algorists: four visual artists in the land of Newton".

Artists in first algorist show: Roman Verostko, Channa Horwitz, Jean Pierre Hebert, Hans  Dehlinger
This picture was taken in 2005 in Channa Horwtiz' studio, Santa Monica CA., USA.

In the years ahead we may expect, as the history is written, that the last quarter of the 20th Century will emerge as the heart of the algorithmic revolution that would profoundly impact world culture in the 21st Century.


Thanks to the curatorial work of Grant Taylor and his years of research a well informed catalogue was published for a showing  of  four American algorists in the fall of 2013. His catalogue essay views  the "American Algorists" as an important chapter in the history of American Art.  The show, celebrating the 20th anniversary of the New York Digital Salon, opened first on August 30th at the Suzanne H. Arnold Art Gallery,  Lebanon Valley College, Annville, PA.   Later, on October 27, the New York showing  opened at the  Westside Gallery, School of Visual Arts in Manhattan.      

DOWNLOAD:  The American Algorists: Linear Sublime.

This catalogue was followed by the publication in 2014 of Taylor's extensive  research on the unfolding milieu of "Computer Art".  The sub-title of this book,  "The Troubled History of Computer Art",  identifies issues well known to those artists who pioneered the form-generating leverage of computers. When the Machine Made Art: The Troubled History of Computer Art (International Texts in Critical Media Aesthetics Vol 7, Bloomsbury, NY)  2014, by Grant D. Taylor,


Note 1.  algorithm & algorism: 

ALGORITHM & ALGORISM are equivalent  terms in  English.  They descend  from the name of the Arabian mathematician, Abū ʿAbdallāh Muḥammad ibn Mūsā, a native of Khwarasm, surnamed  al-Khwārizmī  (c. 780 – c. 850). He  was a Persian  mathematician, astronomer and geographer during the Abbasid Caliphate, a scholar in the House of Wisdom in Baghdad.  It is  believed that his surname, al-Khowarazmi  is the source for the term algorism.

Early usage appears variously as augrime, augryme, algorisme, algarism and variations with latinizing influence as in algorismus. In English the term algorism appears in 17th Century writing as algorithm .  This modification from algorism to algorithm may have been mistakenly influenced by  the Greek term for number that is arithmós (’αριθμός),  the root for our English term arithmetic. In English the term algorithm  is more commonly used today. So one who employs algorithms (algorisms) would be an algorist.

Note 1.a   A surprising range of experimentation with algorithmic leverage as a form of art has grown rapidly since the birth of the world wide web in the early 1990's. Some examples;

cellular automata epigenetic art processing art
cyberarts evolutionary art proceduralism
cybernetic art fractal art robotic art
bio art (Biota) generative art symbiotica
bio art genetic art transhumanist art

Note 2. By the late 1980's the established symposia and exhibition venues that were known to me included: The Inter-Society for Electronic Art (ISEA),  SIGGRAPH , Ars Electronica and the semi-annual Komputerkunst and Golden Plotter Awards,  in Germany (Gladbeck).  The annual Small Computers in the Arts conference (Philadelphia, 1980 ff) was also an important venue in the U.S. recognizing the impact of the PC for individual artists.  At all of these conferences artists could see the work of others and share mutual concerns.  The exhibitions, papers, panels, and publications of these venues provided an overview of  what was generally called "computer art" but there was no single venue for specifically "algorist" work. There were many others. Let me identify several that had a broad impact in the early years:

, the Special Interest group for GRAPHics of the Association for Computer Machinery, ACM, played an important role both nationally and internationally. Its international exhibitions of art and technology with its workshops, lectures and awards provided both learning and exhibition opportunities that served us well.  Many local SIGGRAPH chapter groups, including Minneapolis, met on a regular basis and held regional media exhibitions.

ISEA The International Symposium on Electronic Art. This symposium grew out of the special interest of artists and composers from a broad spectrum of new media that embraced emerging digital technologies. More specialized than SIGGRAPH for those immersed in the arts it also provided workshops, lectures and exhibition venues. First held in Utrecht in 1988 it has enjoyed a healthy growth and remains a premier venue for those involved in electronic arts. (For my role as founding member (1988), active board member in the 1990's and Director in 1993 see: 

ARS ELECTRONICA. Founded in 1979 as a Festival for Arts ,Technology and Scociety, it has served as a premier center of the electronic arts with its exhibitions, publications and prestigious award, the Prix Ars Elecrtronica. Located in Linz, Austria the AQrs Electronia Center  in cludes a Museum of the Future and the Ars Electronica Futurelab.  I especially appreciated their well documented publications and the invitation to exhibit in "Code the Language of Our Time".

Komputerkunst, Gladbeck, Germany. (more notes to be added later)

Symposium: Art & Algorithm - Mind & Machine, 1991

Roman Verostko, The Magic Hand of Chance, 1982. Photo of monitor, frame from an algorithmic sequence,

© r.verostko


To address algorithmic procedure in the arts I organized a small symposium at the Minneapolis College of Art and Design in 1991 (February 23/24). This symposium Art & Algorithm - Mind & Machine, included an audio visual show, "Images of the Unseen From the Worlds of Art & Science". The presentation of video, sound tracks and slides included the work of 23 artists and scientists from 6 countries. 

Algorithmic drawing
Vera Molnar

Courtesy of the artist for the 1991 symposium on Art & algorithm... .


Artists and scientists whose work was shown included: Stephen C.G.Bell (UK), Donna Cox (US), Charlotte Davies (Canada), Hans Dehlinger (Germany), Helamen Ferguson (US),  Samia A. Halaby (US), Bruce Hamilton (US), Jean Pierre Hebert (US), Yoichiro Kawaguchi (Japan),  William Latham (UK), Vera Molnar (France),  Jim Otis (US), Clifford Pickover (US), Jeffrey Ventrella (US), Mark Wilson (US), Toshifumi Kawahara (Japan).

Note 3.  My paper on algorithmic art included examples of  work by several algorists with a note pointing to the  JPH  work on display.  Our  works were shown on opposite walls in the same Sidney gallery and I was especially impressed with the new work JPH had sent.  In another gallery Brian Evans had presented a very impressive show of algorithmic work that included sound and light works.  The ISEA show traveled to Melbourne and the Hebert's large triptych was never returned. His triptych, as I recall now, was an outstanding work excelling anything I had ever seen in algorithmic pen and ink work.  All efforts to recover the work have failed and I view this as a loss to the history of 20th Century algorist art.

Note 4.   The use of the term "algorist" to identify a specific group must be understood in the context of its use. Historically it applied to those who used algorithms for solving mathematical problems. In the late 20th Century we used it to identify the growing number of artists who write algorithms in computer languages for implementing their art.

The  term itself has undergone interesting usage in the history of mathematics. In the late Middle Ages controversies arose between the "algorists" and "abacists". The algorists, having adapted algebra and Arabic numbering, found resistance among the abacists with their classical numbering system and Euclidean Geometry. So the  "algorists" were mathematicians who embraced calculating procedures with the arabic numbering system.  

Patric Prince (Art Historian) poses with 3 algorists in San Diego, August, 2003. Patric Prince collected works by many early digital artists.

Left to Right: Hans Dehlinger, Patric Prince, Jean Pierre Hebert, Roman Verostko 

Algorist art, in the most proper sense, belongs to our own unique time in history. We have, in the view of Peter Weibel, undergone an algorithmic revolution, a revolution that has transformed the worlds of commerce and politics as well as arts & culture. And the first generation of artist algorists were pioneers in applying procedures that are now changing world culture.

Note 5. Quote here is from Brian Evan's paper Numbers to Neurons: Digital Synaesthesi from the PDF version at:

Evan Brian presents this pseudo code excerpt (the first two bars) of  Beethoven's Ode to Joy for his visualization.

  int xcnt, ycnt;
  float radx, rady;

  for (xcnt = 0; xcnt < XDIM; ++xcnt) {
    radx = TWO_PI*((xcnt*1.0)/(XDIM*1.0));
    curr_x = (1.0)*cos(radx*(1.25)+(1.0/64.0)*TWO_PI) +

(1.0)*cos(radx*(1.25)+(2.0/64.0)*TWO_PI) +
(1.0)*cos(radx*(1.33333)+(3.0/64.0)*TWO_PI) +
(1.0)*cos(radx*(1.5)+(4.0/64.0)*TWO_PI) +
(1.0)*cos(radx*(1.5)+(5.0/64.0)*TWO_PI) +
(1.0)*cos(radx*(1.33333)+(6.0/64.0)*TWO_PI) +
(1.0)*cos(radx*(1.25)+(7.0/64.0)*TWO_PI) +
(1.0)*cos(radx*(1.125)+(8.0/64.0)*TWO_PI) +


etc...  <<Return

Note 6. See:     Return to Illustration

Note 7. See Frank Dietrich's account of this period: "Visual Intelligence: The First Decade of Computer Art (1965-1975)",  in IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Vol.5, No.7, pp 34-35, July 1985, Reprinted in Leonardo Vol.19, No.2, pp.159-69, 1986.
(PDF copy at:

For an early account published with a landmark exhibition of computer art see  Cynthia Goodman, Digital Visions, Computers & Art, Everson Museum of Art, Syracuse, Harry N. Abrams, Inc., NY, 1987. <<Return

Note 8.  V&A Pattern: Digital Pioneers, V&A Publishing, Victoria & Albert Museum, 2009. ISBN 9781851775873.   <<Return

Note 9   Jean Pierre and I collaborated in initiating procedures and implementing the usage of the term algorist.  I have had inquiries  on usage of the term "founding member":   I have used the term in reference to those of us who were involved with establishing  the usage of the term "algorist". While the term "algorist" applies to all algorithmic artists this account is meant to clarify the "origins of the usage". This web site attempts to spell out  the milieu from which the usage emerged.

Note 10.  My email files from  that period are not complete. There could have been an earlier email from JP with the algorithm.

Note 11  Loss of files, changes on web pages that were not archived and other circumstances  make it difficult to reconstruct lists.   .

verostko main menu  |  contact | copyright | home